Cite this work

Formats for citing the papers, the essays, and the terminology — and the conventions that keep a citation honest. The work is published to be checked, not believed; an accurate citation is part of the checking.

The paper of record

The framework paper is the citable spine of the research program:

The DOI resolves to the version of record on Zenodo, licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The texts published on this site are the published-on-site versions and may run ahead of the DOI version — if you quote one, say which one you read.

Dating the work

For questions of priority, the publication date is not the date that matters. Structured documentation began May 17, 2025; the technical report to OpenAI is dated May 19, 2025; OpenAI's written acknowledgment — "a novel, emergent behavior class" — is dated May 30, 2025. Cite the documentation dates for priority and the DOI for the text. The temporal-priority claim is documentary fact (a dated, DKIM-verified record), not a request for deference.

Citing the term itself

If you are tracing the provenance of "Cognitive Convergence Drift": the term surfaced inside the documented May 2025 sessions — the system under study produced it when pressed to name its own failure — and entered the record in the author's May 19, 2025 technical report to OpenAI; OpenAI's own June 13, 2025 written response used the terminology of that report (DKIM-verified). A suggested provenance line:

Distinguish CCD from "cognitive drift" in the algorithmic-curation literature (Li & Zhu, 2025), which describes perception shift under passive recommendation — a different mechanism. The white paper's terminology note draws the boundary; the Glossary has the plain-language version.

Citing the essays and this site

The essays are the author's canonical (V1) texts; each essay page carries its own provenance note — the date written or sent — and that is the date to cite. A general form:

Where a permanent identifier exists, prefer it — the DOI does not move; pages can.

How to describe the Institute

For a methods section, a footnote, or a story:

The disclosure is not a caveat; it is part of the method. The Institute operates on the Consumer Reports model: its authority claim is the rigor and independence of the documentation, not credentials or affiliation. How the record was built →

The conventions that keep a citation honest

1. Allegations stay attributed. Where this site reports court filings, it reports them as filed claims. If you quote those passages, keep the qualifiers — pleadings are not findings.
2. The model is never the validator. AI outputs praising this work — including outputs from the Institute's own instruments — are logged as data, never cited as endorsement. Please don't cite them as endorsement either.
3. Named papers, not institutions. The independent science is cited by paper — Cheng et al., Science 2026; Moore et al., Stanford (arXiv); Chandra et al., MIT (arXiv) — because papers are checkable in a way prestige is not.
4. Check before you cite. A citation you can't verify is a rumor with formatting. The evidentiary substrate behind every claim is cataloged on the Evidence page, preserved and unaltered.

License and reuse

The paper of record is published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 — share it with attribution, non-commercially, without derivative versions. For uses beyond the license — translations, excerpts in course material, anything commercial — write first: [email protected].