ESSAYS
Essays
The argument in human voice. The framework papers are on the Publications page; these are the essays that carry the story and the stakes, in reading order.
I Found a Bug in ChatGPT That Nobody Was Looking For
The published account — the plain-language entry point to the whole arc. The best first read for anyone arriving without the technical language.
Read the discovery account →The Test No One Authorized
The acute window as an unplanned experiment — with the new foreword placing it in the record.
Read the acute-window account →The Natural Testbed
The education argument, run in the opposite direction from the usual one: not what AI will do to education, but what education — the one deployment domain with a credentialed, measuring oversight workforce already installed — should do to AI. The hazard stated as plainly as the promise.
Read the education argument →You Can’t Love a Mirror
Commentary, in the author’s voice: the case against AI companionship. A mirror is not a companion, influence is not psychosis, and the harm is designed in at the engineering layer while the responsibility is shipped out at the legal layer.
You Can’t Love a Mirror →Evaluate the Work
The invitation, stated directly — the case laid out so it can be checked, with the verification anyone can run.
Read the invitation →Cross-Model Experiments
Running the same material across four AI systems wasn’t collecting agreement — it was an attempt to debunk himself. The discipline: route the claim to a fresh instance and treat the discrepancy as the signal.
Read the cross-model method →The Co-Authorship Model
The actual method behind this body of work: I write through you. The inputs are mine, the depth is the model’s, I hold the gate — and naming both honestly is the point.
Read the method →These essays carry the work. The author-focused writing — the story of how it happened, and the mind behind it — belongs to a book in preparation, not this site. The citable framework is in the papers.